HealthchecksvsUnregistry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Unregistry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 4 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +21 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 4 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.4.3 · 12 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 63/100 for Unregistry, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Unregistry.
If you want the quickest setup, Unregistry is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Unregistry details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Unregistry, compare it with