HealthchecksvsUmami
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Umami | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 39 754 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +773 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 13 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.4.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Umami scores 85/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Umami ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Umami is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Umami is growing faster right now (+773 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Umami details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Umami, compare it with