HealthchecksvsTrinity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Trinity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #60 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 472 | 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 4 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 57/100 for Trinity, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Trinity.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Trinity needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Trinity details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Trinity, compare it with