HealthchecksvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 117 816 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +5 457 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 457 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with