HealthchecksvsTeleport
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Teleport | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 21 040 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +104 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Teleport scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Teleport details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Teleport, compare it with