HealthchecksvsTasmota
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Tasmota | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 79/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 24 938 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +166 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v16.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Tasmota scores 79/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tasmota.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Tasmota needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Tasmota details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Tasmota, compare it with