HealthchecksvsTaskwarrior
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Taskwarrior | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 15 in Productivity |
| GitHub stars | 10 472 | 6 140 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +110 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.5.0 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 68/100 for Taskwarrior, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Taskwarrior.
If you want the quickest setup, Taskwarrior is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+110 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Taskwarrior details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Taskwarrior, compare it with