HealthchecksvsSure
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Sure | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 62 in Personal Finance |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 10 713 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +681 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.5-hotfix.3 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Sure scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Sure ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Sure is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Sure is growing faster right now (+681 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Sure details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Sure, compare it with