Healthchecksvssuper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | super | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #15 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 875 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 26 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | rpios-v1.2.18 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 53/100 for super, so it is the safer default.
super ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →super details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep super, compare it with