Healthchecksvsstorj
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | storj | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 7 in Distributed Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 3 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 39 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.165.6 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 61/100 for storj, so it is the safer default.
storj ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; storj needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+109 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →storj details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep storj, compare it with