HealthchecksvsSSH & Web Terminal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | SSH & Web Terminal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #30 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.
SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →SSH & Web Terminal details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep SSH & Web Terminal, compare it with