HealthchecksvsSpeedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | — |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.
If you want the quickest setup, Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, compare it with