HealthchecksvsSpacetimeDB
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | SpacetimeDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #7 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 25 401 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +79 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.13.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
SpacetimeDB scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for SpacetimeDB.
Healthchecks details →SpacetimeDB details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep SpacetimeDB, compare it with