HealthchecksvsSketchForge
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | SketchForge | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #9 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 1 176 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 3 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.0.3 · 17 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 55/100 for SketchForge, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for SketchForge.
If you want the quickest setup, SketchForge is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →SketchForge details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep SketchForge, compare it with