Healthchecksvssignserver-ce
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | signserver-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 2 in PKI |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 440 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v7.7.1 · 26 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | LGPL-2.1 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 51/100 for signserver-ce, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for signserver-ce.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; signserver-ce needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →signserver-ce details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep signserver-ce, compare it with