Healthchecksvssidix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | sidix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 31/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #7 of 7 in Local AI |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 25 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.0 · 22 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 31/100 for sidix, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for sidix.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; sidix needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →sidix details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep sidix, compare it with