Healthchecksvssglang
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | sglang | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 38 320 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +1 938 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 17 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.5.22 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sglang scores 86/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
sglang ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; sglang needs more configuration.
sglang is growing faster right now (+1 938 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →sglang details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep sglang, compare it with