HealthchecksvsSerena-MCP
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Serena-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 30 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +1 047 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 19 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Serena-MCP scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Serena-MCP ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Serena-MCP is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Serena-MCP is growing faster right now (+1 047 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Serena-MCP details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Serena-MCP, compare it with