HealthchecksvsSeaweedFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 35 789 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +864 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 28 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+864 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →SeaweedFS details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep SeaweedFS, compare it with