HealthchecksvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 55/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with