HealthchecksvsSaleor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Saleor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 27 in E-commerce |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 23 487 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 80 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 3.23.45 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Saleor scores 75/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Saleor ships more often: 80 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Saleor needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Saleor details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Saleor, compare it with