Healthchecksvsrushdb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | rushdb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #5 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 325 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 33 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.0.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 48/100 for rushdb, so it is the safer default.
rushdb ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; rushdb needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →rushdb details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep rushdb, compare it with