HealthchecksvsRspamd
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Rspamd | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 4 in Anti-Spam |
| GitHub stars | 10 469 | 2 559 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +27 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 14 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 4.2.3 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 65/100 for Rspamd, so it is the safer default.
Rspamd ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Rspamd needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Rspamd details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Rspamd, compare it with