HealthchecksvsResume-Matcher
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Resume-Matcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 28 913 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +405 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.4.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Resume-Matcher scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Resume-Matcher.
If you want the quickest setup, Resume-Matcher is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Resume-Matcher is growing faster right now (+405 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Resume-Matcher details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Resume-Matcher, compare it with