HealthchecksvsRembg
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Rembg | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 25 218 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +79 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.0.86 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Rembg scores 78/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Rembg.
If you want the quickest setup, Rembg is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Rembg details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Rembg, compare it with