HealthchecksvsRedash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Redash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 28 850 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +41 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v26.9.0 · 24 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Redash scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Redash.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+106 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Redash details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Redash, compare it with