HealthchecksvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 21 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with