HealthchecksvsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 44 977 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +1 604 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 34 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 604 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with