HealthchecksvsQGIS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | QGIS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 8 in Geospatial |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 14 734 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +113 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | final-4_2_3 · 28 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
QGIS scores 81/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS.
Healthchecks details →QGIS details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep QGIS, compare it with