HealthchecksvsProject OSRM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Project OSRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 8 179 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +76 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 16 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.
Project OSRM ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Project OSRM details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Project OSRM, compare it with