HealthchecksvsPixelFed
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | PixelFed | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #11 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 7 131 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +24 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 15 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.15.2 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 64/100 for PixelFed, so it is the safer default.
PixelFed ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; PixelFed needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+108 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →PixelFed details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep PixelFed, compare it with