HealthchecksvsPhotoPrism
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | PhotoPrism | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 40 373 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 7 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 261007-65faaae5d · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
PhotoPrism scores 76/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for PhotoPrism.
Healthchecks details →PhotoPrism details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep PhotoPrism, compare it with