Healthchecksvspenpot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 61 801 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +1 489 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot is growing faster right now (+1 489 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →penpot details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep penpot, compare it with