Healthchecksvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 393 291 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +2 943 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 37 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 943 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with