HealthchecksvsOmniTools
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | OmniTools | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 10 498 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +251 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 72/100 for OmniTools, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+251 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →OmniTools details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep OmniTools, compare it with