HealthchecksvsOmniRoute
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | OmniRoute | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 82 151 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +3 135 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 135 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →OmniRoute details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with