Healthchecksvsmultica
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | multica | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #10 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 54 125 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +2 883 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 87 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
multica scores 84/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
multica ships more often: 87 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
multica is growing faster right now (+2 883 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →multica details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep multica, compare it with