Healthchecksvsminecraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | minecraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #1 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 10 464 | 14 492 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +161 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 22 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
minecraft scores 78/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
minecraft ships more often: 22 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, minecraft is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →minecraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep minecraft, compare it with