HealthchecksvsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 10 471 | 50 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +109 | +136 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 38 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Healthchecks details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with