HealthchecksvsLXD
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | LXD | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #3 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 10 465 | 4 844 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +107 | +13 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | lxd-6.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 70/100 for LXD, so it is the safer default.
LXD ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
If you want the quickest setup, LXD is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.
Healthchecks is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →LXD details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep LXD, compare it with