Healthchecksvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 132 699 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +3 244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1467 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 244 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with