HealthchecksvsLibation
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Libation | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #2 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 468 | 6 376 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +106 | +155 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 33 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v14.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | C |
Which one should you pick?
Healthchecks scores 73/100 against 68/100 for Libation, so it is the safer default.
Libation ships more often: 33 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for Healthchecks.
Healthchecks details →Libation details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Libation, compare it with