HealthchecksvsHuly
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Healthchecks | Huly | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring | #4 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 466 | 28 008 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +108 | +247 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 2 |
| Latest release | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 | v0.7.426 · 2 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | EPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Huly scores 74/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.
Healthchecks ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Huly.
If you want the quickest setup, Healthchecks is easier to run; Huly needs more configuration.
Huly is growing faster right now (+247 stars in 30 days).
Healthchecks details →Huly details →
Swap a project
Keep Healthchecks, compare it with
Keep Huly, compare it with