headscalevsMikroDash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| headscale | MikroDash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 31 in Networking | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 45 177 | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 070 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.29.6 · 24 Oct 2026 | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
headscale scores 82/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
MikroDash ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for headscale.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; headscale needs more configuration.
headscale is growing faster right now (+1 070 stars in 30 days).
headscale details →MikroDash details →