Hass-MCPvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hass-MCP | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 132 722 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 267 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 1467 |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Hass-MCP.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 267 stars in 30 days).
Hass-MCP details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with