Hass-MCPvsilla-builder
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Hass-MCP | illa-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 50/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #63 of 104 in Home Automation | #3 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 351 | 12 336 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.6.1 · 24 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
illa-builder scores 67/100 against 50/100 for Hass-MCP, so it is the safer default.
Hass-MCP ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for illa-builder.
If you want the quickest setup, Hass-MCP is easier to run; illa-builder needs more configuration.
illa-builder is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).
Hass-MCP details →illa-builder details →
Swap a project
Keep Hass-MCP, compare it with
Keep illa-builder, compare it with