harnessvssandboxed.sh
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | sandboxed.sh | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 38 756 | 678 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +322 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
harness scores 80/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.
sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.
If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.
harness is growing faster right now (+322 stars in 30 days).
harness details →sandboxed.sh details →