harnessvspidoors
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| harness | pidoors | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 36/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 28 in CI/CD | #69 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 38 753 | 26 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.28.2 · 20 Apr 2026 | v0.4.11 · 12 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Go | PHP |
Which one should you pick?
harness scores 80/100 against 36/100 for pidoors, so it is the safer default.
pidoors ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for harness.
If you want the quickest setup, harness is easier to run; pidoors needs more configuration.
harness is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).
harness details →pidoors details →