Harborvsvoidaccess
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | voidaccess | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #28 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 29 635 | 949 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +191 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 18 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 57/100 for voidaccess, so it is the safer default.
voidaccess ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; voidaccess needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+191 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →voidaccess details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep voidaccess, compare it with