HarborvsVigil365
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | Vigil365 | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 29 643 | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +189 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C# |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor scores 80/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.
Harbor ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Vigil365.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.
Harbor is growing faster right now (+189 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →Vigil365 details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep Vigil365, compare it with